Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Paging Dr. Small Prints--print mess up

Subject: Re: [OM] Paging Dr. Small Prints--print mess up
From: "Sue Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:57:50 -0500
What Joe Schmo does is bring up the photos on the screen on the back of his 
crappy camera and shows them to someone.

Whatever the Frontier does, it will do in in the best way for that process. 
As big as a name that Fuji has with the Frontier, it's just really another 
high volume low cost process like a Noritsu or soemthing. Most printer 
software is complex and would be, were it available separately, hideously 
expensive, making PS look like chump change.

Bill Pearce
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <usher99@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 7:03 PM
Subject: [OM] Paging Dr. Small Prints--print mess up


> Generally like to print on a Fuji frontier---Ran out of time for a
> small project for a whole bunch of 4X6's. Used the labs "print Wizzard
> from the lab for rapid crop of 4X3 Jpegs, down res, and presumptive
> appropriate sharpening.
> Results--ugh for most, waaay tooo soft appearing.  I'm not looking for
> perfection in  a batch process of this for small prints or a
> hypersharpened look , but that It was a leap of faith that did not
> payoff. I have Raw backups from the G9 for most of them. Some required
> more attention so as long as I had to fuss, I used the RAW file and did
> most adjustments in PS CS3. There is another way to send the files
> directly and bypass the print wizzard. Those were better. (usual modus
> operendi) The in camera sharpening set a bit down for usual display
> size and allowing for later adjustment if the RAW not used--not too
> often, if I have time.
>
> The Portra 160 NC from OM were nice right off the bat, in general. So
> is there a way to batch down res and appropriate approximate sharpening
> for a Fuji frontier? The cropping even can take some time in PS, but I
> may not be doing that the best way. I have heard of a NIK software
> sharpenener that has batch sharpening for various printers and even
> different setting for papers. Never have used Qimage but it has been
> mentioned on the list as the best in up-res. This can't be that
> hard--what does Joe Shmo do?  The manager can do some batch adjustments
> at her end too but I'd rather send her the fiinal package if possible.
> She apparently can't accomplish that the "print wizzard", but only from
> original JPG's and likely doesn't want Huge files clogging their inbox,
> though I can send her a CD or whatever.
>
> Sheepishly posted,
> A not feeling so sharp today, Mike
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.59/2310 - Release Date: 08/17/09 
18:04:00

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz