Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] So what Zuiko is the true Bokeh Champ?

Subject: Re: [OM] So what Zuiko is the true Bokeh Champ?
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 02:43:00 +0800
Can't agree on the highlight problem as bad bokeh not only seen on highlight 
area but everywhere of the OOF foreground/background. USM is 'almost' not 
necessary with good digital back and sharp lenses.

C.H.Ling


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Norton"

>> I concur with this, I do not believe that the nature of the capture 
>> medium
>> could have any effect on the bokeh, just as it cannot have any effect on
>> resolving power, unless somebody proves otherwise to me.
>
> As you'd expect, I don't agree with this.  I believe the capture medium 
> has
> quite a bit of bearing on bokeh characteristics.
>
> 1. Digital sensors have their own inherent flare which is easily seen with
> ultra-bright spots within the image. Film has a uniform lateral halation 
> in
> all directions (ie, blob), whereas you will get a  multibladed "fan" as a
> result of the physical nature of the sensor and microlenses
>
> 2. Film is "self-attenuating", in that the straight-line response section 
> of
> film is relatively short and the toe and shoulder is long.  Digital has
> little to no self-attenuation and the straight-line section is much longer
> in comparison. This causes OOF highlights in digital to actually be 
> brighter
> than they are in a comparable film image
>
> 3. Microlenses, again... The MF digital backs are nearly always designed
> without microlenses as there is a very distinct change in the images. I
> could cite song and verse on this, but a google search such suffice. The 
> MF
> back makers found that it is better to correct vignetting in software than
> it is to throw microlenses on the sensor
>
> 5. USM-based stepping in the penumbra. (2*:* a surrounding or adjoining
> region in which something exists in a lesser degre*e). When you take a
> gentle falloff and apply USM to that falloff, you can get one or more
> distinct steps.
>
>
> I have noticed a distinct difference in the bokeh from my 100/2.8 in film
> and digital. Even when I account for the cropped format by the difference 
> is
> clear to see.* **The 100/2.8 has buttery smooth bokeh on the film images,
> but has a busy, raspy look on the E-1/.
>
> AG

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz