Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability

Subject: [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability
From: "Bob Docherty" <lostkase@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:03:50 -0400
Silly human! You need them both, of course! The OM-2SP is also nice. :)

Bob
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Walters, Martin" <mwalters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 9:53 AM
Subject: [OM] OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability


> 
> Unlike some on the list with multiple OM bodies, my (one and only) OM 2N
> is on its way to John for a CLA/repair. So, I'm wondering about getting
> either another OM 2N or a 4T(i) - and pondering my justification to the
> CDFO.  I know the OM 2 is, and will remain, clearly repairable for a
> good while. What about the 4T(i)? Some bodies are approaching 20 years
> old. I presume that if the circuit board goes - the primary difference
> between the two - it's either an expensive paper weight or a significant
> repair bill.
> 
> Martin 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz