Leandro:
Though not clear in my original post, I do have an OM-1. I've kind of
got spoiled by the "automatic" side of the OM 2 and not having to worry
about light changes while shooting. Maybe I'm getting lazier (or wiser)
with age.
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Leandro DUTRA
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 11:13 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability
2008/4/4, Walters, Martin <mwalters@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> I know the OM 2 is, and will remain, clearly repairable for a good
> while. What about the 4T(i)? Some bodies are approaching 20 years
> old. I presume that if the circuit board goes - the primary difference
> between the two - it's either an expensive paper weight or a
> significant repair bill.
If you want ultimate reliability, go OM-1 or 3...
--
skype:leandro.gfc.dutra?chat Yahoo!: ymsgr:sendIM?lgcdutra
+55 (11) 3040 7300 r155 gTalk: xmpp:leandrod@xxxxxxxxxx
+55 (11) 9406 7191 ICQ/AIM: aim:GoIM?screenname=61287803
+55 (11) 5685 2219 MSN: msnim:chat?contact=leandro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|