Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OT: in the UK, who is responsible for goods damaged in transit?

Subject: [OM] Re: OT: in the UK, who is responsible for goods damaged in transit?
From: Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:10:11 -0500
I wonder if this is one of the up sides of having Republicans run  
things for so long. I could be wrong, but I also could swear that  
many, many moons ago, the IRS didn't seem to care much about return  
on its time, but rather catching people doing wrong stuff, and they  
made little guys hurt real bad whether they deserved it or not. Then,  
oh, about 1980 or so <g>, this whole return on investment thing  
caught fire. <wink>

But, like I said, it was a long time ago. I recall many of my  
father's rants about the IRS, as he did a lot of tax and estate work,  
and his opinion of the government back in the 60s and 70s was not  
very high.

--Bob Whitmire
www.bwp33.com




On Feb 24, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Moose wrote:

> Agents and offices are
> rated much like businesses, on return. Spending time beating taxpayers
> up over little things that can't, by their nature, return much
> additional tax revenue for the time spent, just results in poor
> performance reviews and lack of promotion.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz