Indeed it is. Once you've got past the novelty that it's a complet
non-photographic construct, what are you left with?
A rather ordinary photo-realistic 'painting'.
Cleverness is never quite enough somehow.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 28/07/2007, at 2:14 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Incredible!
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Jeff Keller wrote:
>> If you have a few free hours ( 2,000?) and know how to use photoshop
>> layers (15,000) you might not need a camera ...
>> <http://www.bertmonroy.com/fineart/text/fineart_damen.htm>
>>
>> -jeff
>>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|