Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: A little cottage, was Re: Re: Photo

Subject: [OM] Re: A little cottage, was Re: Re: Photo
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:42 -0700
Daniel,

Thanks for the notes. I picked the inexpensive 50/1.4 up in hopes of getting
more shots to work at the Monterey Bay aquarium, I had an awful lot of
blurry jelly fish photos from motion.

Moose did a fine job of explaining why a macro lens is better, even with a
extension tube, since I am groaning about 'sharpness'.

Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of David Thatcher
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:37 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: A little cottage, was Re: Re: Photo


Doesn't that cause the heating from the gulf stream not to  make it into
the great atlantic trench flow, causing  El Nono?   :)

Actually wind power is great. basically a one-off resource consumption
to create the infrastructure, then everything after that is profit. But
MAN it's UGLY! Still gotta be better than firing coal, though!

I did play that game once- with a car alternator, learned that the
blades have to be PERFECTLY balanced at the speeds encountered. ther
result was not pretty.

davidt


On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:32:15PM +1100, Wayne Harridge wrote:
> Yeah, but what happens when you remove all that energy from the wind ?
> 
> David T ?
> 
> ...Wayne


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz