I dunno. Got a reference?
Chuck Norcutt
AG Schnozz wrote:
>>However he hasn't demonstrated that that is the case for a
>>D200/5D comparison and, even if it is, you may be right about
>>there being no disecernable difference at 16x20 or whatever
>>is the relevant print size for your sales.
>
>
> Hah, didn't somebody's test show that 8x10's from the 5D were
> much sharper than D200 prints? Something like 100% of the
> people could pick out the 5D 8x10s?
>
> AG-give me a break-Schnozz
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|