I think your stuff is exceptionally well lit. Perhaps we're our own
worst critics.
Chuck Norcutt
Jeff Keller wrote:
> One of the things I look for are odd shadows or bright spots that
> shout that the photograph had artificial lighting. I've never seen
> anything in your images that hint of a problem. On the other hand, I
> have used my own photos that have some odd sources of light. The
> ceiling above an open door that is brightly lit on the darker side of
> the doorway, a bathtub that has light coming out of it. For sure if
> someone thought about it for more than 2 seconds they would know they
> aren't going to see the same thing. However when people buy a house
> they want to show pictures of it to their friends and co-workers. The
> fixer-upper that growls at anyone stopping to look has to have
> pictures that the buyer will be proud to show. It can be fun.
>
> I love the street shot of your neighborhood. The most similar parts of
> Palo Alto have $2M to $3M+ homes. In one of the areas, what appeared
> to be essentially just a large lot judging by the description, sold
> for $5M (I think the lot was about 20k sq ft ). Most architects tell
> people to expect to pay $300 per sq ft. to build a house. Your
> pictures are at least as good as anything I've done. I definitely have
> to put some time into learning about software.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|