I think much of it is psychological. There are
standards and everything else is sort of frowned upon.
Again that is what the market dictates.
--- AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Perhaps the advantage that a C*non (or maybe
> N*kon) would
> > bring is the ability to throw away pixels.
>
> Actually, the biggest advantage to a C/N isn't
> pixels, high-ISO
> performance (we're talking newsprint here, not 20x30
> landscapes), or even AF speed. It's the ability to
> use "pool
> equipment". If you're shooting for somebody that
> has a 600/4
> available to you, get the camera that will use that
> lens.
>
> For wedding work, anything will do if you can adapt
> your
> shooting methods around the limitations. There are
> still a few
> holdouts that are shooting weddings with
> manual-focus,
> manual-wind, manual-exposure medium-format cameras.
>
> AG
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low
> PC-to-Phone call rates
> (http://voice.yahoo.com)
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the New
Yahoo.com
(http://www.yahoo.com/preview)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|