Chuck wrote:
> No, I think it's the "Olympus" list. I've never seen OM in the name.
You are correct of course. I guess it was the [OM] at the begining of the
subject line in every post that through me off. ;^)
Also, to clarify, I have no problem with non OM (or even non Olympus)
discussion. My objection was directed toward the comments about Khens' OM
posts, further down in the thread I was replying to. I apologize for not
making that clear in my previous post.
Darin
> Although OM used to be the major discussion because it was the major
> line the list has always catered to Olympus cameras going back to to the
> 2-1/4 cameras of the 30's, 40's and 50's. I think it's only natural
> that the discussion turn more and more to the current line of cameras
> but without excluding any.
>
> If you want OM discussion you need only contribute a point or ask a
> question. I add a lot of OT Canyon talk but I try to keep it in a
> comparative sense so that it's not totally OT. I had to go that way
> since photography has become my business in the past 3 years and Olympus
> wasn't making what I needed. I stay here for lots of reasons but I'm
> still hoping that Olympus will deliver what I waited for until I
> couldn't wait any longer.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Darin wrote:
>
>> After all, this is the "OM list" isn't it, not the E-thingy list.
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/446 - Release Date: 9/12/2006
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|