Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Next E-x?

Subject: [OM] Re: Next E-x?
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:13:15 -0700
It seems to me that making a camera for an especially talented  
handholder certainly limits your customers. Some other very fine  
photographers admit that they shake to much to hand hold successfully  
using the usual rule. And I doubt Mr. Iwago is that stable shooting  
from a boat. IS/VR is an additional tool that is useful to anyone, I  
think. The power issue is true, but I don't understand the reluctance  
to increase battery size.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:33 PM, khen lim wrote:

> At Olympus - and I do share the same viewpoint - we are constantly  
> debating
> over the necessity of IS from a true photographic sense because we  
> have pro
> users who tell us that they don't need them and one of them is a  
> powerful
> stalwart user, Mitsuaki Iwago who continues to handhold the Zuiko  
> Digital
> 150/2 with absolutely no problems at all and his images are  
> stunning to say
> the least. The issue we are fighting against is that one should  
> learn how to
> handle camera+lens as most have been doing for decades prior to the  
> digital
> era.
> Another very strong issue at Olympus is that IS draws power very badly
> particularly for the in-lens design types and marginally less for  
> CCD-shift
> types.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz