"It all depends whether you will use the camera frequently at ISOs most
of us never use."
That's a very key point. I'm not part of "most of us" in this case and
plan to make use of those ISOs. I'm fond of the term "available
darkness". That's where I do much of my shooting.
Chuck Norcutt
Winsor Crosby wrote:
> For what it is worth, the D200 is a very refined camera to use and as
> Phil Askey points out in his review of the D200 there is not much
> difference at all in resolution between 10 and 12 MP. It all depends
> whether you will use the camera frequently at ISOs most of us never
> use. Certainly Nikon's early commitment to designing telecentric wide
> angle lenses is worth something. Of course you can look for someone
> else's old WA lenses to put them on your Canon. :-)
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Bernard Frangoulis wrote:
>
>
>>Good reasoning... I am myself just starting to consider the
>>possible options. Not really happy with the E-1, and not willing to
>>buy any more ZD lenses. So... D200 or 5D or 30D... Ah, choices ;-)
>>
>>Bernard
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|