On Feb 10, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
> Whether sample variation makes any sense in this particular case I
> don't
> know. However, there certainly is sample variation around... witness
> Andrew's 14-45 results with a lens you'd have thought might have been
> cherry picked from the line.
I don't know, there could be some use in having reviewers get the
worst samples of a lens. Imagine, then the reviewer can write things
like, "great body but you need to replace the kit lens with some of
Olympus' better offerings."
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|