Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Now is that a sweet camera or what?

Subject: [OM] Re: Now is that a sweet camera or what?
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:21:16 +1100
I heard about that on the A2 but never used - a friend of mine was  
waiting for the A3, hoping for a better lens as he felt that optical  
quality was the only thing stopping it from being the perfect EVF  
model. I guess he'll be disappointed.
I suppose that i'll now get flamed by KM- A fans - not my position,  
just reportage OK?!
AndrewF


On 27/01/2006, at 11:08 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> Notice that I said high res EVF.  By that I mean one that has as much
> resolution as your computer monitor.  They do exist but no one has put
> one in a consumer camera yet.  The Minolta A2 (which I've never used)
> has a 640x480 EVF.  A lot better than the totally inadequate  
> 320x240 in
> the A1 but still a long way from 1024x768 or 1280x960.  These  
> higher res
> EVF's must be expensive since, when Minolta did the A200, they went  
> back
> to the 320x240 EVF.
>
> A really high res EVF would be much better than an optical viewfinder.
> When used with a real-time, interline sensor it can be amplified to  
> show
> you exactly what the exposure will look like as you change the  
> exposure
> settings.  As the light level gets extremely low where it becomes hard
> to maintain color information it can also be switched to B&W mode and
> amplified more so you can still see the image.  I think it will be a
> revolution when it finally arrives.  But at 320x240 it's not much  
> better
> than a peep-hole for framing.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Andrew Fildes wrote:
>
>
>> Well, don't know about you but the best EVF I've used is worse than
>> the worst SLR optical finder. By a very long way. (Can't help it, I
>> just hate them). It's like looking at a coarse TV image down a
>> tunnel  with too high a contrast level.  I'd rather chimp on an EVF
>> until I've got abso-bloody-lutely no alternative.
>> Interesting to see that the price point on the E-330 is significantly
>> higher than the 500.
>> AndrewF
>>
>>
>> On 26/01/2006, at 11:17 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Clever indeed!  However, it's hard for me to see where a high res  
>>> EVF
>>> wouldn't produce a camera with superior usability and possibly lower
>>> cost by replacing all that slow and expensive mechanical/optical
>>> arrangement.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz