That meade me smile, Chris. Don't know about the hostelries over Potton*
way, but around here those of us who look too Gollum-like don't get served!
=;-)
--
Piers
*OK, I know, it's this side of the border, but it's t'other side of the
Greensand Ridge, almost into Mordor!
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Chris Barker
Sent: 15 December 2005 19:45
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: OT English as she is spoke OT
You might be right Piers, depending on how close the second sentence is to
the meaning I think (or you think) it has ... ;-)
I despair of hearing the present conditional on Radio 4, let alone the
future. We ought to get together, at a suitable hostelry, to discuss it,
not least because it would be nice to see My Preciousss, I mean the 24
shift, again! ;-)
Chris
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
On 15 Dec 2005, at 09:46, Piers Hemy wrote:
> I think it's a _diiferent_ tense required, Chris, since it is clear
> that the
> interviewer is talking about a future date, not a past date. Thus
> "were to
> do", the future conditional, an even rarer species than the
> pluperfect, and
> in that respect way more better an example*.
>
> Alternatively, if you insist on your version, then the interviewer
> would
> need to continue "would have been a better outcome"!! I duly claim
> my £2
> Gift Voucher.
>
> But yes, it also gets up my olfactory organ, this forced
> obsequiousness
> (blimey, can I spell that word?) which is no more than a veiled
> insult.
>
> --
> Piers
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|