Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Photoshop RAW converter question

Subject: [OM] Re: Photoshop RAW converter question
From: AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:54:18 -0800 (PST)
> I guess you've answered your own question in the best way, by
> trying it for yourself.

Yeah, it's amazing how that works...

To answer the question, no RSE isn't a pixel off.  It ain't
anything off.  There are a few minor workflow quibbles and the
WB settings are from Mars, but it made quick work of setting
custom conversions of 175 images tonight of the Porcupines.  I
know I'll have to revisit a couple dozen, but at seven seconds
per conversion (including the writing of a 16 bit Tiff), it hums
right along.

The laptop's cooling fan is kicking out some serious heat.

When working on specific pictures intended for serious
nit-picking, I'll go all out and use whichever converter gives
me exactly what I want, but for the 90% rule I can easily be
happy with either Viewer (which also displays JPEGs) or RSE. 
Other than being able to extract a smidge more detail out of the
E-1 files (ok, slightly more than a smidge).  I was set to buy
Studio, but I'll probably end up getting Raw Shooter Premium,
instead just for the Minolta support.  But not this week.

I don't believe this, the batch processor just finished. This is
almost as fun as the chemical darkroom.

NOT!

AG


        
                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz