BTW
on thing that struck me about DPreview's E-300 review,
Is that they could'nt found any trace of purple fringing on high
contrast images shoot with the camera.
Phil Askey asks (:-D) if the camera could have had some sort of
built-in purple fringing removal, since there seem to be some in-camera
postprocessing on an image.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse300/page20.asp
Hei, Phil!
Could'nt that be the quality of the telecentric design of the lense,
and it's absence of chromatic abberation?
Doesn't this make sense?
Alfredo
On Aug 26, 2005, at 2:11 PM, Dorothée Rapp wrote:
>
> Bernard Frangoulis schrieb:
>
>> Couldn't you convince your "colisters" to speak
>> English (which is not my language either, but
>> which I can read, write and speak!) ;-)))
>>
>>
> ;)
> I'm pretty sure discussions would become very short there if we would
> switch to english :)).
> But I do my best to forward what I think might be of interest to the OM
> list every now and then - but, as you said, the day has only 24
> hours....
>
>> Would make a nice change from the dpreview
>> Olympus SLR forum (which is not the worst, but
>> can get quite heated and is a little bit
>> "bigotted" - is there such a word?).
>>
>>
> there is the word in german anyway. I don't follow that list any
> longer,
> too much noise and not enough information for me.
>
> ciao
> :Doro
> --
>
> www.doro-foto.de
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|