Legalise, so if someone uses it to brush their teeth, gets sick/dies,
Swiffer's parent company can tell the court the 'victim' was warned.
Right up their with warnings on frozen pizza packages to 'Remove from
carton before cooking' and 'Cook before eating'.
Welcome to the Lowest Common Denominator World.
ScottGee1
On 5/13/05, Michael R. Collins <michael789@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> >> Old socks are likely to deposit as much as they remove. The Swiffer may
> >> be a revelation to you. It really is like a magnet.
> >
> > Interesting -- I'd assumed it was another of those things they'd
> >invented purely to sell us more supplies, but I'll give it a look.
>
> Don't confuse it with the Swiffer Wet, though. The DIRECTIONS FOR USE
> on the that product's package (as sold in Canada) begin as follows:
> "(for U.S. only): It is in violation of U.S. federal law to use this
> product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling." There is no
> similar caution for Canadians and Mexicans, presumably due to the
> laxness of the legal system in those NAFTA countries.
>
> So: what U.S. federal law is this? And what "inconsistent" uses would
> constitute violations? And the penalty for such violations? Enquiring
> minds want to know...
>
> Michael
> --
> Michael R. Collins ... Michael.Collins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Toronto, Ontario, Canada
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|