Yes, Winsor is right, that is my point. At lowest ISO the noise should not
influence the resolution of a camera. On the other hand, it is obvious that
E-300 has better overall image quality especially at high ISO.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks, I think it get it now. The comparison in dpreview between the
> E300
> and C-8080 I thought had more to do with resolution, so I was puzzled that
> noise popped up as part of the thread. I guess he is implying that
> comparing the E300 at ASA 100 and C-8080 at 50 is not unfair to the
> E300. Good to know.
>
> Joel W.
>
> At 10:41 AM 1/17/2005 -0800, you wrote:
>
>>I think that he was just pointing out that noise is a factor of sensor
>>size. Under ideal, bright conditions there should be little difference
>>in the images from each of the cameras at the base ISO which is
>>noiseless. The larger sensor camera will just provide relatively noise
>>free images under a much wider range of conditions and noise does
>>interfere with detail.
>>
>>
>>
>>Winsor
>>Long Beach, California, USA
>>On Jan 17, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|