Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: moonlighting

Subject: [OM] Re: moonlighting
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:12:06 +0100
I am tempted to send you a Bah! Humbug! Winsor... ;-)

There's nothing wrong with a bit of frothy water old chap.  Clichés are 
clichés, I agree, but as long as there is something different there's 
art in it.  I'm no singer, but I understand that vibrato on the long 
notes is considered a cliché among the cognoscenti but that does not 
stop an audience enjoying the skill and the aesthetics of the 
performance.

Now, this is nothing to do with the fact that I might (or might not) 
have spent some spare time on my recent holiday by the sea fixing ND 
filters and polarisers to a lens to induce a long exposure ... ;-)

Chris

On 19 Oct 2004, at 17:29, Winsor Crosby wrote:

>
snip
> What I really don't understand is when the artifact is aped as when
> 35mm camera users take a nature photograph and deliberately choose a
> slow shutter speed to imitate the defect of a large format camera with
> a frequency that it has become such a universal cliche that I have seen
> experienced photographers instruct newbies on this "proper" way to
> photograph water. Which famous Spanish guitarist was it that published
> his playing method with detailed fingerings  and he was imitated by
> students for hundreds of years until it was pointed out that he was
> missing fingers.
>
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz