They are the best you can get with "normal" equipment, I keep the "original"
and let you do the scaling, I think everyone know how to do it and make a
fair comparision themself on their screen. (i.e. bicubic sample up the 10D
image in 10% or less a step to the size of the scanned one).
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Digital vs. Film discussions REQUEST TO DSLR USERS
>
> I have looked at this when you posted it before, but it is hard for me
> to reach any conclusion either way when the scale of the photos are so
> different. The detail in the 10D example is a fraction of the size of
> the detail in the scan. How can you tell. Ironically the contrast and
> color is so diminished in the scan that in many areas detail is no
> better and sometimes worse than the same areas in the much smaller 10D
> image.
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, CA
> USA
> On Aug 14, 2004, at 7:38 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
> > I have done lots of comparison, if just talking about resolution, film
> > is
> > still clearly better. But for "noise" and "color", digital is a winner.
> > Below is a resolution test I have posted before:
> >
> > http://www.accura.com.hk/Film-10D.htm
> >
> > C.H.Ling
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|