Check the microscope view you will see 4000dpi already get out over 95% of
the image details, if you want the grain not details then you can still
argue for a higher resolution scan.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Worby" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>
> > I have done lots of comparison, if just talking about resolution, film
is
> > still clearly better. But for "noise" and "color", digital is a winner.
> > Below is a resolution test I have posted before:
> >
> > http://www.accura.com.hk/Film-10D.htm
>
> Thanks for this. But I still don't think that scanning negatives is a fair
way of doing a comparison at all. If films comes out better for resolution
through scanning negatives, then it has to be streaks ahead for the printed
product...
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|