[OM] Re: 50mm/1.2

[Roland Ruehl]

Skip,

I don't agree with your 200. More like your 300 not including OM hood 
and filter.

Why ? Because new is not what you find as mint. In general, I have only 
made few good experiences with buying used equipment - often it is 
similar to buying at Fry's: you need to go back three times until it 
works ... I guess I'm a perfectionist and emotional about my equipment 
... which is why I use Zuiko's in the first place ;-)

Cheers,

    Roland.

Skip Williams wrote:

>I hate to ask, but I have to.  Why would you have paid $617.00 for this lens?  
>It's available use in almost mint condition for $200-300.
>
>Skip
>
>
>----- Original Message ---------------
>
>Subject: [OM] 50mm/1.2
>   From: Roland Ruehl <roland.ruehl@xxxxxxx>
>   Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:53:19 -0700
>     To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>  
>
>>List,
>>
>>I have a 50mm/1.2 that I bought new in March at B&H with UV fiter and 
>>original slip-on lens hood (I paid US 617.-). It still has more than 6 
>>months waranty on it. I barely use it. If anybody is interested, please 
>>make me an offer off-list.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>   Roland Ruehl.
>>
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>>    
>>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>  
>



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================