Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc...

Subject: [OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc...
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:04:24 +0100
Yes indeedy, hats off to Moose for thorough evaluation of all the data
available, and impeccable diagnosis.

So, what's new! 

Oh and I take back much of what I offered Jim as explanation (so, what's
new!!) and apologize for unwarranted insults delivered.

Piers 

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Winsor Crosby
Sent: 10 July 2004 18:08
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc...


Smarter than any of us.



Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On Jul 10, 2004, at 1:37 AM, Moose wrote:

> If external, it appears the camera did as instructed; it took an 
> underexposed picture.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz