| Subject: | [OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies |
|---|---|
| From: | Jez.Cunningham@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 25 May 2004 19:21:31 +0200 |
Piers said: > Perhaps you have made a good argument for an E-1, which will produce prints direct, and to your wife's liking? ;-) I'm working that angle in my negotiations with the CDFO... br jez ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies, yves barbaroux |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies, Piers Hemy |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies, yves barbaroux |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies, Piers Hemy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |