I sympathize sometimes, but overall I find the amount OK.
I don't think it's a good idea to stick to OM only, as this will slowly get
thinner and thinner, so I'd definitely be interested in other Olympus stuff
(remember, I'm not anti-Olympus). The 8080 review someone recently pointed
to was interesting.
I'm also somewhat interested in what people who have chosen similar camera
equipment to mine may choose next, and why, as there's a good chance they
may share my ideas about what makes cameras worthwhile tools and nice to
use.
I wouldn't want the non-OM ratio to drift too much farther yet, but on
average people seem to be on about the same wavelength. I'm currently
enjoying the fact that for the past while the posts have mainly been about
photography.
Andrew
on 2004/04/08 8:38 PM, GeoW at gwsears@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Nice site. It is a darned shame that this OM list has been allowed to drift to
> so many topics digital.
>
> I also feel that this list needs a member vote to either allow all things
> Olympus to include digital, or keep the list Olympus OM, as it was started.
>
> I may be alone on this matter but am becoming weary of digital matter of which
> I consider clutter.
>
> OM Zuiko lenses on digital bodies still on topic :-)
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|