Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OM-2 vs. OM-2n (WAS: olympus Digest V1 #46)

Subject: [OM] Re: OM-2 vs. OM-2n (WAS: olympus Digest V1 #46)
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:56:32 -0000
Hola Fernando!

OK, but give me credit for remembering why you preferred the 2 over the 2n! 

:-)

Piers

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
Sent: 27 February 2004 05:38
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: OM-2 vs. OM-2n (WAS: olympus Digest V1 #46)

on 26/02/2004 23:20, Listar at listar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> ...{but]... the electromagnetic shutter will quickly drain the battery 
> when it stays open for extended periods. "

Hi Piers,

Since I joined this list, I'm telling over and over this never hapenned to
me. IIRC, months ago you told me 'flat batteries, Fernando'. They weren't,
rest assured. I calculated the exposure time measuring the star trails but
it's too late and must go to sleep instead of searching for the figures now,
sorry :-(

> There must surely be an opportunity for some crreative "looks like 
> second curtain flash sync" photo there?
Yes I have a couple of these ;))

Fernando


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe:
mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz