| Subject: | [OM] Re: OM-2 vs. OM-2n (WAS: olympus Digest V1 #46) |
|---|---|
| From: | Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:22:34 -0300 |
on 27/02/2004 23:17, Listar at listar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hola Fernando! > > OK, but give me credit for remembering why you preferred the 2 over the 2n! > > :-) > > Piers Ha ha !! Sure :-) But my efforts to gather partisans to my cause doesn't seem fruitful so far... Abrazo, Fernando The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200 f 2.8, Walt Wayman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OM-2 vs. OM-2n (WAS: olympus Digest V1 #46), Gordon J. Ross |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM-2 vs. OM-2n (WAS: olympus Digest V1 #46), Gordon J. Ross |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM-2 vs. OM-2n (WAS: olympus Digest V1 #46), Piers Hemy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |