I fundamentally agree with all you've written, Gord. I said the review of
the new Canon _almost_ made me whisper . . . iwantyou. <g>
Tris
At 12:43 AM 2/3/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Tris:
>
>The faint music of star wars should accompany this lens site, there is
>however no light saber attachment just yet. Impressive all you can eat menu
>but not designed for a subtle walkabout.
>The camera, say what you will about capability, it looks like a bloated
>Rebel! OK so much for the positives.... as with most digigear the longer
>you wait the better it is and the cheaper it gets, my new 'w' class laptop
>was only $1400.00 with 17" screen, 2000Professional, R/W DVD etc. etc.
>plasma screens are 1/3 of the price they were and will get cheaper, someone
>is going to make a teutonic digicam that doesn't look and feel like
>rubbermolded binoculars and I'm going to buy it and put it in my Billingham
>alongside my OM 4Ti and with any luck at all I hope to be able to use the
>same lenses. The bright side of OM slipping on the retail end is that they
>may have to then look back to us as their 'natural market' and cater to us a
>little in order to regroup.
>
>Gord
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|