Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs conventional lenses - fact or hype?

Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs conventional lenses - fact or hype?
From: Donald Shedrick <shedridc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
I agree there have been advances since the 70's, and some of the
later Zuikos have incorporated them (such as the 250mm f2), as have
Nikon, Canon, etc.  But the E-1 hype would have us believe that they
have come up with something better than these advances just for
digital.

--- Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Don asked, perhaps with tongue in cheek,
> >What new technology in glass or lens
> >design has enabled this?
> 
> [Lama clears his throat, takes a sip of water and begins.]
> Uhm, this may be a bit awkward so you may want to send the children
> out of the room while I explain this.
> 
> Some of the early lenses, though okay in 1972, were not leaders in
> the relm of sharpness.  For example, why did it it take more than
> 10 years to produce a superbly sharp STANDARD LENS??
> 
> Late designs like the 90/2 and the 35mm-70mm f/3.6 zoom were
> obviously superior.  What I'm saying is the 3.6 zoom is sharper
> than
> almost all of the varieties of non-macro 50mm lenses.
> 
> 30 years ago, they weren't able to mold plastic with the incredible
> repeatablity they can now.  I've read that it means that means
> that centering elements is now automatic and precise and in the old
> days it wasn't.  On top of that, Oly didn't use ED glass much
> and I don't think they ever used a single aspheric element.  If I
> recall my history, in 1972, they didn't even have machine tools to
> grind an aspherical element.  For the price of a color tv, you get
> a vastly better lens today than 30 years ago.
> 
> Then there are the automation advances, the most impressive to me
> being auto-balancing, variable fill-flash on a dial!
> 
> Don asked,
> >Why have no other manufacturers come up with it?>
> 
> 
> Well, they have.  See the reputation of the Tamron 80-200 SP f/2.8
> and those 35-105 and 28-105 jobs.  As I read it, there's also an
> element of framing the latest and greatest Oly as well, the latest
> and greatest.  What would you say if someone refused to by an OM
> unless it took his Pen lenses?  It's kinda beside the point to the
> marketing guys so they answer you with the selling points again,
> and again, and again, until you either buy or you step away from
> the counter.  That's their place on the food chain.  :)
> 
> Lama
> 
> 


=====
Don Shedrick 

http://groups.msn.com/firstlightimaging


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz