Ah! you do own a lots of Zuikos, then you should give them more chance to
work with you, you will like them. Seriously the 90/2 is an excellent lens,
it works well with both slides and negatives. I found it is not easy to
found a lens that produce good prints especially with one hour lab. I have
good result with 35/2, 35-70/3.6, 50/3.5, 90/2, 180/2.8 but not 135/2.8 and
50/1.4MC >1M, mostly with the same lab and I can't explain why, the poor one
just shown strange contrast. With slides most of them looks fine except
35-70/3.6 which shown low contrast.
If I didn't get the 40/2 in a package I will not buy it at ebay price. After
selling most of the stuffs I think I only pay less than $100 for it, so not
a bad deal but require some afford to handle the sales.
C.H.Ling
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Whatever you say, you're the expert.
>
> I do like Zuikos, and with 18,21,24,28,35,50,85,100,135,200 and 300mm
> fixed and 35-70/3.6, 35-70/3.5-4.5 and 75-150 zooms, I don't think I can
> be accused of being under Zuikoed.
>
> If somebody wants to send me a 90/2 for tryout, maybe I can be convinced
> ;-) .
>
> The 40/2 looks cute, but can't possibly be worth the price to me. If
> priced like a 35mm, sure I might try one. My very nice 35/2.8 cost $50.
>
> Moose
>
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|