Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Vivitar Series l 28-90 and Zuiko 35-105

Subject: Re: [OM] Vivitar Series l 28-90 and Zuiko 35-105
From: "Titoy" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:02:42 +0800
HI Martin

Thanks for your comments, I read on monaghan's website that some users
report flare problems and low contrast, or warm colors as the lens ages.Do
you experience these?

Thanks

titoy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin G Flink" <mgflink@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 10:40 PM
Subject: [OM] Vivitar Series l 28-90 and Zuiko 35-105


> Titoy,
>
> I agree with John in keeping your 35-105 Zuiko, but I also have the
Vivitar
> Series l 28-90 and find it to be an excellent lens albeit quite a bit
larger
> than the dimunitive Zuiko in comparision.  You might find the varifocal
> design (one touch) rather than zoom a bit different.  It has a 67mm
filter.
> You can close focus at 50mm.
>
> I have been very pleased with the results.
>
> Marty
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Titoy" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 10:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] Second Impressions: Tamron 35-105/2.8 SP
>
>
> > John,
> >
> > I have had the same experiences as you do with the zuiko 35 - 105, I
just
> > bought and am now awaiting arrival of a vivitar series one 28 - 90
F2.8 -
> > 3.x hoping to enjoy the same benefits as you have with the tamron. My
main
> > attraction to the vivitar is the 28 mm wide end, and as I think the 90
mm
> > long is good enough.
> >
> > Anyone have any comments on this vivitar? If this vivitar works, I may
get
> > rid of my 35 - 105
> >
> > Titoy
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 12:47 PM
> > Subject: [OM] Second Impressions: Tamron 35-105/2.8 SP
> >
> >
> > > Got to run a few rolls behind the Tamron 35-105/2.8 SP (Adaptall II)
> over
> > > the past few days and portions of a wedding with it tonight.
> > >
> > > Note left out from before.  Unlike the Zuiko's, the Tamron has
half-stop
> > > detents on the aperture ring.  Gotta remember this as I sometimes
jockey
> > > the aperture from a preset and count detents!
> > >
> > > Second Impressions (in use):
> > >
> > > Shot a test roll through it before doing something critical (wedding):
> > >    Sharp
> > >    contrasty
> > >    Excellent flare control
> > >    Decent bokeh
> > >    Accurate meter biasing through the Adaptall II
> > >
> > > Just got home from shooting wedding candids with it:
> > > Camera body for the candids was an OM-2S with 2-13 screen.  The
one-plus
> > > stop increase in speed is a **major** improvement over the Zuiko
> > > 35-105/3.5~4.5 in ease of focusing.  Much brighter viewfinder combined
> > with
> > > a noticeably shallower depth of field make life much easier when
lights
> > are
> > > dimmed down.  NO blacked out RF spot (wooo-hooo) which has been a pain
> in
> > > low light with the Zuiko.  Didn't think one stop would make that much
> > > difference, but it does.  Otherwise it works much the same (albeit
> > slightly
> > > bigger and heavier).  In the past I've had to resort to the 50/1.4 MC
> and
> > > swap it out with the 85/2 to get some standoff.  Tonight I didn't need
> to
> > > and that's a blessing.  Simplicity with one lens means fewer lost
candid
> > > opportunities.  It's bad enough when changing film; combine that with
> > > swapping lenses and the percentage of missed opportunities increases.
> > >
> > > Did discover its larger barrel won't allow me to mount the camera on
the
> > > rotating flash bracket with the lens mounted on the body.  I have to
> mount
> > > the body, then mount the lens.  No real issue with this as I use other
> > > camera bodies and lenses for available light work.  Should have
realized
> > > this as the Zuiko 35-105 barrel just barely fits.
> > >
> > > I have now joined the ranks of non-OEM lens users. <sigh>
> > > It's the fast 35-105 Olympus *should* have made.
> > >
> > > Footnote:
> > > BTW, I'd have been saving my nickels and dimes for a 35-80/2.8 Zuiko,
> but
> > I
> > > use the extra 25mm range at the long end heavily.
> > >
> > > -- John
> > > Who's typing this in from the on-line hookup at the f-Stop Bar and
Grill
> > >
> > >
> > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> > >
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz