As I recall he had been accused of "improper" manipulation. I know he did
use some specialized filters. He supposedly aided in the development of some
of the Singh filters. /jim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Moose
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:24 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Galen Rowell and the moon
Lovely picture, George
I'm sure Galen R. claimed that he did no 'tricks' to his images.
It really is so hard to tell much from such small, downsampled and
compressed images.
Moose
George M. Anderson wrote:
>Here's one of mine with the 300/4.5 Zuiko + 1.4. Your pot shot hit the
>bulls eye I'd say.
>
>http://www.whitneygallery.com/html/moon_court.html
>
>George
>
>>Doesn't look like a photograph to me at all. Looks like elements of photos
>>are here, but the 'sky' color has no gradation, which I'm accustomed to
>>seeing in any sky, from dawn to dusk. The 'water' looks unnatural in the
>>view that includes a pure black sillohuette. I think the question of focal
>>length is moot on this one... Just what is the focal length of photoshop?
>>;-)
>>
>>I'm sure our astrophotographers could tell us what focal length
>>would render
>>the moon to film in that proportion to a full frame. I'll take a pot shot
>>and say 400.
>>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|