----- Original Message -----
From: "Mickey Trageser" <vze3m2s8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, 18 January, 2003 07:44 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Galen Rowell and the moon
> Doesn't look like a photograph to me at all. Looks like elements of photos
> are here, but the 'sky' color has no gradation, which I'm accustomed to
> seeing in any sky, from dawn to dusk. The 'water' looks unnatural in the
> view that includes a pure black sillohuette. I think the question of focal
> length is moot on this one... Just what is the focal length of photoshop?
> ;-)
>
> I'm sure our astrophotographers could tell us what focal length would
render
> the moon to film in that proportion to a full frame. I'll take a pot shot
> and say 400.
I'm inclined to think that it's a patch and paste PhotoShop job!
jh
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|