Doesn't look like a photograph to me at all. Looks like elements of photos
are here, but the 'sky' color has no gradation, which I'm accustomed to
seeing in any sky, from dawn to dusk. The 'water' looks unnatural in the
view that includes a pure black sillohuette. I think the question of focal
length is moot on this one... Just what is the focal length of photoshop?
;-)
I'm sure our astrophotographers could tell us what focal length would render
the moon to film in that proportion to a full frame. I'll take a pot shot
and say 400.
Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hudson" <13874@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "LIST - Olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 6:17 PM
Subject: [OM] Galen Rowell and the moon
> Tonight there is a brilliant full moon over south eastern New Brunswick.
> Driving home on the Trans Canada Highway the moon rose over the north
> eastern horizon at about 5pm and the view reminded me of the image by
Galen
> Rowell found in the bottom right hand corner of this page:.
>
> http://www.mountainlight.com/stockdept/stockportfolio.html
>
> I an curious about the focal length of the lens Rowell used for this shot
> and wonder if anyone might like to offer an opinion.
>
> John Hudson
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|