Thanks for your "encouragements" I will post more
and for the list that keep OM alive.
I think I will wait to "catch" a 85/2 following your advices.
Christian
Le jeu, 19 déc 2002, vous avez écrit :
> Your english is fine, and don't lurk so much. We love to see new voices.
>
> I'd expect the 75/2.5 to be a very good lens, as good or better than the
> 85/2. It's not readily available here in the US though. It costs $475
> here, if you can find it. You could buy an 85/2 from KEH for $300.
>
> Personnaly, I'd rather have the 85/2. There isn't very much difference
> between the 75mm and 85mm focal lengths. And you get 1/2 stop more light
> with the 85/2.
>
> If you don't need the reach of the 100, sell it and buy an 85 and a
> 135/3.5. That would be $300 for the 85 and $75 for the 135/3.5. You could
> sell the 100/2.8 for $125. So the whole change from 100 to 85+135 would
> cost ~$250.
>
> Skip
>
>
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: fischerchristian fischerchristian@xxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:31:08 +0100
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] Portrait lens
>
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I dont post very much.
> I am affraid my english may not be correct.
>
> Has anybody used or made tests of Voigtlander/Cosina 75mm ?
> I have the 100/2.8 and 50/3.5, think the 85/2 to close from the 100mm.
> I am interested with this 75mm.
> An other possibility is to trade the 100 for 85 ;-)
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|