|Subject:||Re: [OM] Hawaii recommendations (another travel kit..)|
|Date:||Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:59:51 -0800|
Weird, I guess. I shot my roll right at 400. No grain visible to my
naked 20/10 eye on a 4x6 print. Were yours earlier versons? This was ver. 3.
Moose C.H.Ling wrote:
I have tried two rolls, the grain appear in one hour lab print not scanning, it is the worse film I have ever used. I think over expose it by one or two stops may be better, but I just made it dead right.For ISO400, Kodak Supra 400 and Fuji Superia are much better.C.H.Ling dreammoose wrote:Although I have only used it once, I would certainly not call it grainy. <>......
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [OM] Opinions wanted: OK picture?, Richard F. Man|
|Next by Date:||Re: [OM] Sunrises Was: Hawaii recommendations (another travel kit..), Tim Chakravorty|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [OM] Hawaii recommendations (another travel kit..), C.H.Ling|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [OM] Hawaii recommendations (another travel kit..), suchismit|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|