Not sure I can answer that as written. Seems the flaw in all of my lenses is
not in the lens, but the dimwit standing behind them! That said, I'd say
that when we evaluate a lens and look for its merits, we are likely to find
what it is best for, and not flaws. However, if we find that it does not fit
our shooting niche, then the reason is a flaw. So it's a case of the 'glass'
being half full or empty...
-Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "AG Schnozz" <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: [OM] Junk or treasure
> Which brings me to my point of discussion. When is a flaw in a
> lens actually a benefit?
>
> AG-Schnozz
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|