Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re:[OM] lens discussion - N*k*n etc

Subject: Re:[OM] lens discussion - N*k*n etc
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:51:23 -0700
At 06:10 PM 9/17/2002 -0700, Tim Chakravorty wrote:
...
Again , its important that for best quality you shoot from a sturdy tripod. Here is an extract from John B. Williams's
'Image Clarity' pg 191.
"
....handholding is strictly for dead photographers: a human pulse beat will cause 200 microns (about 0.008 inch) displacement for 1/10th second. Assuming a shutter speed of 1/250th sec., this movement alone will cause a 220ss of resolution with a system that is otherwise capable of reproducing 100 lines-per-mm (lpm). And at a shutter speed of 1/125th sec., this performance would degrade
to only 53 lpm-a 47% waste of what you purchased ....
...

This almost makes sense, except that: the camera isn't sitting on your vein and get affected by the "pulse modulation" :-) directly. i.e. can you (or J Williams) prove that a camera move anywhere close to 200 microns in 1/10th while being handheld due to the pulse? It probably moves that much or more (?) simply because the camera holder has slightly shaky hands and has nothing to do w/ pulse!

But of course if he or she is dead, then yes, that won't be any camera movement per se.


// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com>. We had a server CRASH :-( Please rejoin ImageCraft mailing lists <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz