great. First no one on the list gets the option of all that equipment as it is
immediately sold to some wholesale guy because of an incredibly huge "time"
constraint. Please. Its not much more time than typing all these posts on how
much worse the OM system is than these new trendy things. - and the wholesale
prices we all could have benefited from.
Now we have to keep hearing how the OM system doesn't cut it in the "real"
world, when it actually does. Much better, in fact, in the hands of someone who
knows what their doing.
Larry H.
"Larry J. Clark" wrote:
> I did the comparison side-by-side (I did have 2 Om bodies and 14 or 15
> lenses to choose from).
>
> Sorry, but the OM system didn't win in the real world.
>
> > Dear Larry,
> >
> > Sorry to see you go, especially since those "compact" RF Cosina /
> > Voigtlander R2s you like weigh much the same as the OM-F, OM-G
> > and OM-PC,
> > are the same size as all the OMs (except ~15mm less thick without
> > a lens -
> > and just as thick with), and lack the spot metering of the 2s, 3, 4. They
> > are bigger and weigh more when you have to add the viewfinder for
> > the wider
> > lenses.
> >
> > The only advantage I see is better wide-angle focusing and wider
> > rectilinear lenses of 12 & 15mm.
> >
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|