7/31/2002 5:30:20 PM, Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Good suggestions, although I would stick with the "pro" bodies as
>basis for future expansion.
i myself am of the opinion that i'd rather cut corners elsewhere and save the
additional funds needed to upgrade to a single digit pro body than get a double
digit. in fact, i was almost dead set on an
FM2n or FM2/T before i saw an OM1n!
>Revised:
>
>Low: OM 1N, 28/3.5, 50/1.8, 100/2.8, extension tubes.
>
>High: OM 4Ti, 24/2, 35-80/2.8, 135/2.8, extension tubes.
>--
>Winsor Crosby
>Long Beach, California
>
>?
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|