| Subject: | RE: [OM] Best Tri-pod for OM |
|---|---|
| From: | "Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:55:13 -0500 |
Yes, that may be the deciding factor. It is often very convenient to have eye-level viewing. <snip> Yes, if I was a bit shorter I'd have gone for that (the one I have = 3021pro), but I wanted to have the camera at eye-level without needing the center column. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Best Tri-pod for OM, Daniel J. Mitchell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Tom Scales |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Best Tri-pod for OM, Daniel J. Mitchell |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Best Tri-pod for OM, Brian Swale |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |