Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 200 ISO, was what to shoot in London

Subject: Re: [OM] 200 ISO, was what to shoot in London
From: Bill Stanke <bstanke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:29:19 -0700
Winsor,

No, no no.  You haven't been following the discussion.  It's a reason to
upgrade your f/2.8 glass to f/2 glass.

Please see the "Twelve stop program" (advanced or terminal cases) for
details on the final phase of Zuikoholicism.

Bill Stanke

(Who is only two steps along the path...)

Winsor Crosby wrote:
> 
> >Hi Siddiq, For film, I find something in 200ASA is a good general purpose
> >film in Britain, being suitable all year round for handheld shooting. You
> >may prefer something slower for Kew Gardens though.  I'd second the
> >suggestion to take an open top tourist bus, It'll give you a feel for the
> >city & will give you ideas.  Best to do this first.  Try the Tower of
> >London, which is supposed to be good.  Haven't been myself yet, but an old
> >Army pal is a Beefeater there!
> >
> >Andy Gilbert
> >Exeter
> >Devon
> >England
> 
> My impression from several film articles is that 200 ISO film is sort
> of the stepchild that no one likes.  Images(grain, color, contrast,
> etc.) are reputed to be no better than a good ISO400 in exchange for
> the loss of 1 F stop. I know if I cannot make do with 100 ISO I want
> a jump to 400.
> --
> Winsor Crosby
> Long Beach, California
> 
> ?
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz