| Subject: | RE: [OM] OM series durability so why digital? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:56:42 -0800 |
I didn't name names. And, to quote Rhett Butler, frankly my dear... -----Original Message----- From: AG Schnozz Better watch it, Jim. You're on company mail! < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] OM series durability so why digital?, AG Schnozz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] OM series durability so why digital?, AG Schnozz |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM series durability so why digital?, AG Schnozz |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM series durability so why digital?, AG Schnozz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |