Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: [OM] 300mm cost (now)

Subject: Re: Re: [OM] 300mm cost (now)
From: Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 13:04:19 +1100



> Johnny Johnson <jjohnso4@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Instead of debating if Kierstin should purchase a Vivitar 300mm or a 
> Olympus 300mm I think it'd be more appropriate to ask if this is the
> right 
> focal length for her to purchase at this time.  I've owned an Oly
> 300mm 
> since the seventies and I bet I haven't shot a roll of film with it
> during 
> that time.  It's too big to conveniently carry around, it should be
> mounted 
> on a tripod a lot of the time for best results, and I just don't have
> that 
> many occasions where I find a need for that length.  Mine stays in
> the 
> closet most of the time.
> 
> So, what say you?  Is a 300mm a reasonable choice for a second lens
> for a 
> beginner?
> 

I must admit, it is not a focal length I use often, something around 135mm is 
much 
more useful for me.

Wayne Harridge

http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz