Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:41:59 +0800
Depends on what lenses you own or use most, the lenses I use most is:

21/2, 24/2, 35-70/3.6 and 85-250

So the 100/2 is better for me :-) okay, just joking, I rare use filter.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Couch" <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Good analysis Olaf, I would add one thing that may be of importance in
> considering the lenses. The 85 f/2 and the 100 f/2.8 both use 49 mm
filters
> whereas the 100 f/2 uses a 55 mm filter. To my mind one of the real
practical
> advantages of the 85 f/2 is that it does use the 49 mm filter which is the
same
> as a majority of Zuikos.
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz