Well, I was about to say the same thing. The 100/2.8 and 100/2 are both
wonderful. But I like the 85/2 best. Partially because it allows portraits
in a smaller room. Mostly because I just love the results. It's so
smoooooooth.
Tom
> At 06:09 PM 1/4/02 -0800, Scott G. wrote:
> >Well, as usual, I'm on the horns of a dilemma. I've been thinking of
doing
> >some "portrait" work. Nothing fancy, and certainly nothing professional.
> >Just some better shots of family.
> >
>
> Scott,
>
> Just to be a little different, give some thought to the 85/2. I've used
the
> 100/2.8 and the 135 and like them both as well, however, for my style of
> shooting family shots the 85 seems to come to hand the most. I tend to
work
> in tight and if you are shooting family you already have a "closer"
> relationship than 3rd party type portrait shots. Second choice would be my
> ever faithful 100/2.8 silvernose -- marvelous lens too.
>
> Barry H
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|