Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8
From: andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:45:27 +1100
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dave Shupe" <kc7iek@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:54 PM
>Subject: RE: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8
>
>
>Could someone explain "BOKEH" to me.  I see the term quite often on this
>forum and I think it has something to do with the out of focus background
>part of a photograph, usually mentioned with portrait type lenses.  I've
>just never been real sure what it means.
>  << snip all>>
>-------------------------
>
>Thank God someone has finally posed this question.
>I thought I was the only one in the dark on this.
>Charles Monroe
>


One of the most discussed areas on any photo-list. Try a search - here's a
few but there are hundreds, with examples -
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm
http://www.minox.org/bokeh.html
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/bokeh.htm

AndrewF



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz