Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 35/2.0 vs 24/2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] 35/2.0 vs 24/2.8
From: "M. Royer" <royer007@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 09:47:46 -0800 (PST)
If it was me I would keep the 24/2.8 since the jump
from 50 to 35 wouldn't be large enough and 24mm is a
superwide which give a very unique perspective to your
pics. Try the 24 and 35mm out on the same subjects if
you can. Pick whichever you like better and would use
more.

Mark Lloyd

--- Steve Dropkin <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In trading some (non-Olympus) camera equipment I
> don't need 
> complicating life, I have come across the
> opportunity to trade my 
> 24/2.8 Zuiko for a 35/2.0 Zuiko.
> 
> I'm wondering what this really does for me. Not
> having money to spend 
> in this area right now, it pretty much would have to
> be a trade, 
> though I would consider getting the 35 and then
> selling either it or 
> the 24 off the auction sites (haven't sold before
> and I really just 
> don't want to get started). The 35's price is fair,
> not a Fang.
> 
> My current lenses are the 24/2.8, the 50/1.8, and
> the 135/3.5 (all 
> Zuiko). I find the three make a good set, though a
> 100 would make a 
> better progression.
> 
> I know the Zuikoholic answer is "you need them all,"
> but I would need 
> some pretty strong arguments that the 35 adds _that_
> much to the 
> repertoire that it justifies the expense of buying
> it with the 24 and 
> the 50. Being relatively new to 35mm SLR
> photography, I think I 
> should spend more time practicing picture
> composition and lighting 
> effects than choosing lenses, so the fewer lenses,
> the better (at 
> least for now). And I'll be buying a house this
> year, so cleaning up 
> outstanding loans and saving for curtains and
> late-night "home 
> improvements" is taking front stage right now.
> 
> Other trading choices are the 100/2.0 Zuiko or a
> Vivitar 75(?)-205 
> macrofocusing zoom (knew I shoulda written that one
> down). (N.B. that 
> these are not all "even-up" trades for the 24/2.8; I
> probably could 
> swing the cash difference between one of those and
> the traded 
> equipment.)
> 
> So what says the group? I recall a somewhat similar
> conversation 
> about wide-to-normal lenses not too long ago, but I
> don't know where 
> to find an archive for 2001/2002 discussions. Can
> someone point me in 
> the right direction?
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> Steve


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz